Welcome! | Log In
BLUEGRASS SERVER | Year: 159 Era: 19

HGG Community Forums

Inbreeding and Line Breeding in real life - Horse Genetics Game - Forum
Log In to HorseGeneticsGame
Members log in here:
Username:
Password:

By hitting the above you signify that you agree with our rules and conditions.
Forgot your password?
HGG Community Forums

Join our discord server!

Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

In this Discussion

Who's Online (0)

Inbreeding and Line Breeding in real life
  • I need help understanding inbreeding and line breeding in real life horses. Specifically what the difference is between the two, at what percentage of inbreeding do you have to start worrying about “problems” and what kind of “problems” might arise? I tried looking into it myself but got kind of lost in the more technical parts. Does anyone have a an explanation that even someone with zero genetics knowledge could understand? Thanks!
  • I would check and see if any registered breeds rule books have any insight? From what ive ever seen on registered papered horses pedigrees its normally 4th generation and older where you see some inbreeding " like 1 or 2 horses being on each parents line " but i think its far out enough where theres little to no risk. I would see if maybe there are any horse breeders who would have the answers.
  • Linebreeding is a slippery slope. I could point to dozens of breeds of dogs for example, who have been ruined by breeders who thought they were doing the right thing by linebreeding but instead doubled up on both those wanted genes and genes that cause weakness, poor conformation and death. Any line breeding must be done with rigorous attention to bad genes.. it looks like we now have tools to help with this, DNA tests!
    I am Fiddler, my pronouns are she/her
    and my game number is 276934

    image

  • So here's the thing with breeding. Line breeding is still inbreeding.

    Line breeding was (and still is) considered acceptable in domestic animals, specially show animals, because they are trying to double down on the more favorable traits.

    Where this causes a problem is you are also doubling down on negative traits as well. And some of these traits you can't see when heterozygous, but may see them when homozygous.

    I personally find linebreeding to be outdated. There was a study in the Thoroughbred showing that higher levels of inbreeding in have reduced athletic ability as well as lower fertility.

    There is this thing called inbreeding depression (here's the wiki). Basically it says over time, inbreeding decreases the animals ability to survive and pass down it's genes to the next generation.

    Inbreeding depression is a real problem with closed stud books. Most of the horse associations that started, didn't start off with a viable number of foundation members. And if you look at historic photos of these members, there wasn't a uniform type. Inbreeding created more uniformity. And historically, research suggests that inbreeding did help with performance. But at some point it reached a tipping point, and then these breeds started to get problems.

    Realistically you want to keep your inbreeding coefficients below 5%, I've seen 10% in some places, but I think that might be for breeds where this can't be avoided. For example, some populations of Thoroughbreds have a inbreeding coefficient of 10-15%. I'm not clear on the reason why, but having requirements for line-cover only could have been a contributing factor. Along with the outdated idea with inbreeding increases performance. I know that the Akhal Teke Association only allowed live cover at one point, and I think within the last 10 years or so they voted to allow for frozen semen. Genetic viability and access to other bloodlines was a major deciding factor into why they changed their rules.

    Here is an inbreeding coefficient calculator if you're interested in checking a horses pedigree.
  • I really appreciate the replies so far!

    Here’s a little more background to my questions. Get ready, it’s a frustrating situation!
    I know of a herd of horses with an already small gene pool that has been allowed to breed indiscriminately for the last 10 to 15 years. This herd was started in the 50’s, supposedly with 12 horses of unknown breed and pedigree as the foundation. The foundation herd was four stallions and the rest were mares. The only outside breeding was the addition of a mustang stallion sometime in the 90’s and a stallion of unknown breeding introduced sometime in the last 10 years or so. The herd has passed through multiple “breeders” and documentation of the herd has unfortunately gone downhill with each owner.
    Recently they were transferred to a new owner who wants to keep the herd together by selling them all to a new “breeder”. The current owner is not intentionally breeding. Although last I heard, the yearling colts hadn’t been separated from their moms, sisters, aunts and granddams yet. A friend of mine is trying to help the current owner understand that the herd needs to be dispersed and not be left to breed. Or at the very least, not left to breed indiscriminately as one large group. Baby steps to start with in this situation. If we push too hard for the end of their breeding all together we might be shut out entirely. We’re hoping that pointing out the genetic risks might help them understand where we’re coming from.
    Unfortunately the current owner hates me so I’m trying to help from the shadows by doing research my friend can then pass along. Because of this I feel like I need to be cautious with how many details I give out.

    What I can comfortably share is this:
    The horses had parentage tests done and many of the younger horses came back inconclusive. Typically with a match for their dam but no known sire, or vice versa. Their sires or dams must have been horses that passed away during those years of essentially being feral. There are a handful of older horses left with known pedigrees or almost fully known pedigrees.
    I did enter the pedigrees of the horses that we know through an inbreeding calculator (https://www.nabssar.org/coi_calculator/ ) and got results anywhere from at least 4.10% to 38.50% inbred.
    Next I ran a bunch of theoretical foals through the calculator with different sire and dam possibilities. I only did this with mares and stallions with known pedigrees. I was getting results from 6.13% to 61.79% inbreeding depending on the pairing. That worst one would be if a certain mare was bred to her son, yikes!

    To me, the overall health of the herd seems good from a glance, but I’m no vet. Most of these horses have never had any sort of vet or farrier assessment. A couple of them have problems with locking stifles, poor teeth and cataracts, but they’re all older horses. I’m not a good judge of conformation so I can’t really comment on that. There’s no data regarding average foal crop so we can’t tell if there’s any decrease in fertility or not. Foals do seem to be born in the winter though, so foal mortality might have been high in the past.

    I’m sure a lot of you will be frustrated reading about this herd, and trust me I’m frustrated too. The only chance I see for changing this herd’s future for the better is with scientific, genetic fact. So I’m hoping we can keep this discussion focused on explaining line breeding and inbreeding. The current owner has zero knowledge of genetics, so the simpler the explanation the better.

    Again, thank you all for your time!
  • Are you talking about a strain of Spanish Horses? Like mustangs allowed to breed on private land, basically becoming a Ranch Strain? If so I'd recommend a couple of people you might be able to reach out to and get the herd tested.

    Pedigree evaluation for an inbreeding coefficient isn't always exact because it's assuming that DNA is inherited exactly 50/50. But it doesn't tell you what markers were actually inherited, genetic analysis will tell you that.

    There's been a study on Prezwalski (sp) horses, and you can see how inbreeding has changed their skeleton and teeth. I'm on my.phone now, but will try to find it when I get home. I think they turned it into a documentary a few years back.
  • One of the origin stories for this herd is that it was started from a single herd of mustangs, but there's no documented proof.

    Now that you've mentioned the Przewalski's horse I remembered something interesting! I found a genetic variation report most likely from 1990 or earlier for this herd. In the analysis of their serum proteins, specifically on the "XK" system, they found an allele that's found in Przewalski's horses but not reported in domestic horses. Not sure what that really means but I think it's interesting.
  • Dr. E Gus Cothran and Dr. Phillip Sponenberg are both retired now. But they used to do a lot of genetic work with horses, specially rare breeds and Colonial Spanish Horses. I'm sure there are others out there that have taken their place now, but those were the names I remember from when I was doing research on colonial horses in school.

    You could try reaching out to the Texas A&M Lab to see if they could help you with any testing. According to the website Dr.Cothran still consults with them. https://vetmed.tamu.edu/animalgenetics/contact-us/

    I consulted with Dr.Cothran over 20 years ago on the Florida Cracker Horse, a ranch strain of horses closely related to the Spanish horses brought to Florida.

    Dr.Sponenberg might still consult with The Livestock Conservancy (https://livestockconservancy.org/). Do you know the name of this herd/breed? There are a few ranch strains of feral horses, many of them have been dispersed because the original families were no longer able to take care of them.

    Of the dozens of Spanish Horse registries, you'll find Dr.Sponenberg's name being referenced. He's done a lot of work in reference to their genetic diversity and conservation.

Join our discord server!